Why Libertarianism is so dangerous..

5 thoughts on “Why Libertarianism is so dangerous..

  1. Spaldam January 29, 2017 / 12:02 PM

    Libertarian does not mean the absence of government. It means government focused on protecting the rights of the individual.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thomas Hill January 29, 2017 / 12:17 PM

      I can agree with that. I believe most libertarians would. I imagine the biggest argument would be about how said government is funded. It is fair to ask, “If a government is focusing on protecting the rights of the individual, it must not use coercion to fund said government?”…


      • oiltranslator January 30, 2017 / 8:17 PM

        That is raised in RAH “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress” and is a virtuous limit to converge toward, stepwise, at every available opportunity or, as Rothbard really put it, “take what we can get, then go for more.” Direction is important; destination can wait.


  2. oiltranslator January 30, 2017 / 5:10 PM

    All I, I mean we, had to do was assume reality isn’t what it is and SchoolSucks immediately sounded like a sane, rational person with a cogent argument–not an equivocating sockpuppet. This should be added to the aynrandlexicon.com

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Hank Phillips January 31, 2017 / 6:36 AM

    Retaliatory force gooood. Initiation of force baaaad. (I am working on a way to make the concept intelligible to primitive looters)

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s